February 13–16, 2017

Conference Dates and Location: 
February 22–25, 2016 | Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract Number: 

STI Data From Community-Based PrEP Implementation Suggest Changes to CDC Guidelines


Sarit A. Golub1; Stephanie Pena2; Kailip Boonrai3; Nora Douglas2; Machel Hunt2; Asa Radix2
1Hunter Coll and the Grad Cntr, City Univ of New York, New York, NY, USA;2Callen-Lorde Community Hlth Cntr, New York, NY, USA;3Hunter HIV/AIDS Rsr Team (HART), Hunter Coll, New York, NY, USA

Abstract Body: 

Current CDC Clinical Practice Guidelines for the provision of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommend screening for sexually transmitted infections (STI) only every 6 months, unless patients report symptoms. CDC’s 2015 STD Treatment Guidelines recommend STI screening for MSM every 3-6 months, but emphasize testing those with past STI history.

SPARK is a community-based PrEP demonstration project conducted at the largest LGBT health center in New York City. Patients prescribed PrEP are screened for urethral/rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia as well as syphilis every 3 months, and also visit the clinic for STI testing and treatment between study visits if they experience symptoms. STI data for patients in the 6-months prior to starting PrEP and in their first 12-months taking PrEP were abstracted from electronic medical records (EMR). We examined: a) the number and type of STIs that were diagnosed at each time point; b) diagnosis due to symptomatic patient presentation versus routine screening; and c) whether or not a positive STI at a previous time point would have triggered asymptomatic screening (absent the SPARK study protocol). 

Among the 280 patients who began PrEP, 21% (n = 58) had an STI in the 6-months prior to starting PrEP (including 11% who tested positive for an STI at their PrEP prescription visit). At 3-month follow-up, 13% of patients were diagnosed with STIs, with 77% of these cases (10% of the total sample) resulting from routine screening, rather than symptomatic presentation.  In addition, only 33% of patients with STIs at 3-month follow-up had a prior history of STI that would have triggered screening. At 9-month follow-up, 15% of patients were diagnosed with STIs, with 68% (10% of the total sample) diagnoses as a result of routine rather than symptomatic screening. Even though the percentage of patients with repeat STI diagnoses increased over time, basing STI screening on prior diagnosis at the 9-month visit would have missed 16% of STI cases. Overall, STI screening according to current CDC guidelines would have delayed diagnosis and treatment for 24% of PrEP patients, including 40 cases of rectal STI and 3 cases of syphilis. 

Current CDC guidelines may miss a significant number of asymptomatic STI among PrEP users. STI screening may be particularly important at the first 3-month follow-up visit. Routine STI testing at each PrEP prescription visit appears warranted, with particular attention to those with past STI history. 

Session Number: 
Session Title: 
It's Complicated: Renal Function and STIs in PrEP Users
Presenting Author: 
Sarit Golub
Presenter Institution: 
Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York
Poster to be submitted.